March 08, 2005

Pondering Band Names

Someone just asked me a question I don't know the answer to (yeah, there are a lot of those, but usually I can just make something up: this time I was stumped):

How many syllables are there in the ideal band's name?

Off the top of my head, the low is one ("Yes" and "Lard") and the high is six ("The Polyphonic Spree"). What is the "right" number?

Update: On further reflection, the high is fourteen ("Presidents of the United States of America"), which is clearly too many.

Posted by baltar at March 8, 2005 05:54 PM | TrackBack | Posted to Music


Comments

Clearly it is four:
The-Flam-ing-Lips

Posted by: binky at March 9, 2005 08:36 AM | PERMALINK

Although, I should perhaps reconsider that: Led Zep-lin and Pink-Floyd.

There's also the issue of Blood-less-Coup, which in addition to being the name of this delightful endeavor, is also the name of my on-and-off band since about 1986.

Posted by: binky at March 9, 2005 08:55 AM | PERMALINK

i vote for 4:

throw-ing mus-es

fif-ty foot wave (premier full-length CD hit the street yesterday -- damn, gotta buy that)

duran duran.

heh.

of course, the beatles are three.

Posted by: joshua at March 9, 2005 09:48 AM | PERMALINK

I wonder if it depends on whether or not there is a definite article at the start of the name. Or if there is an "and" in it. I think the ideal number depends on the structure of the band name.

Though if you can exclude the "the" and "and" bands I think that if you can find just the right word it's probably one, something like Yes or Air, or, alternatively, four (given my personal tastes Elastica, Death Cab for Cutie and Franz Ferdinand would be good examples).

Posted by: Armand at March 9, 2005 12:07 PM | PERMALINK

Four does seem to be a good generally acceptable number. Though the one syllabus names have a certain amount of elegance.

Posted by: Baltar at March 9, 2005 12:43 PM | PERMALINK

Oooh, the teacher comes out! That might be a good professor-band name: Syllabus. But with umlauts. Somewhere.

Posted by: binky at March 9, 2005 02:05 PM | PERMALINK

what makes you think umlauts would want to be in the band.

umlaut would be a good band name too.

but in keeping with four syllables, how about:

"misplaced umlaut." or maybe "misused umlaut." or just "missing umlaut."

also, randomly, "miscegenate."

how about GOP-her. you know, like G.O.P. her, except it also looks like gopher, so that's actually two syllables and four syllables AT THE SAME TIME!!!!

damn i'm good.

where's morris when you need him? how about "no w.m.d."

i'm killing myself over here.

Posted by: joshua at March 9, 2005 05:11 PM | PERMALINK

and btw, binky, i don't know what godawful regional dialect you grew up in, but it's Led Zep pe lin, four syllables.

silly.

Posted by: joshua at March 9, 2005 05:13 PM | PERMALINK

Joshua,
Like your name, the perfect band would have three syllables. Besides The Beatles and Led Zeppelin, there's Fleetwood Mac, Talking Heads, Simple Minds, Third Eye Blind, Concrete Blonde, and Counting Crows. And Violent Femmes would count too, as long as I use a regional slur. Then again, if I use a regional drawl, throwing muses could turn into like seven or eight syllables, at least.

Posted by: Morris at March 9, 2005 10:07 PM | PERMALINK

I say Vi-lent. Just like Zep-lin.

Oh my goodness... mark your calendars... Morris and I have agreed on something.

Posted by: binky at March 10, 2005 11:19 AM | PERMALINK

I'm a fan of the minimalist band name: one word, one syllable. Case in point: Tits (up and coming San Fran-based band).

Posted by: DB at March 12, 2005 05:24 PM | PERMALINK

Is there a band named "No"? I thought that one might work well.

Posted by: baltar at March 12, 2005 10:38 PM | PERMALINK
Post a comment









Remember personal info?