April 11, 2007

Accurate Job Descriptions

From a story in today's WaPo:

The White House wants to appoint a high-powered czar to oversee the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan with authority to issue directions to the Pentagon, the State Department and other agencies, but it has had trouble finding anyone able and willing to take the job, according to people close to the situation.

...

The administration's interest in the idea stems from long-standing concern over the coordination of civilian and military efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan by different parts of the U.S. government. The Defense and State departments have long struggled over their roles and responsibilities in Iraq, with the White House often forced to referee.

...

Unlike O'Sullivan, the new czar would report directly to Bush and to Hadley and would have the title of assistant to the president, just as Hadley and the other highest-ranking White House officials have, the sources said. The new czar would also have "tasking authority," or the power to issue directions, over other agencies, they said.

Uh, don't we already have someone with stature and authority, whose job it is to manage the government bureaucracy and make sure that different agencies are all working in the same direction, for the same goals? Isn't that something called a "Chief Executive", or maybe we could shorten that to "President"?

Posted by baltar at April 11, 2007 10:10 AM | TrackBack | Posted to Corporate Bullshit | Iraq | Politics


Comments
Post a comment









Remember personal info?