August 19, 2007

The Dearth of Republican Vice Presidential Possibilities

So I know others (who are more specialized in American politics than I am) who would disagree, but it seems to me that the likeliest Republican presidential nominees are Mitt Romney and Rudy Giuliani. It also seems to me that if either one of them wins the nomination, they will be quite constrained when making their pick for the vice presidential nod. Both Romney and Giuliani are deeply distrusted by (at least) one key component of the Republican base. In particular, both are seen as suspect on matters key to the party's Sunbelt base. So it seems to me that they won't be able to pick anyone who might be suspected of having moderate tendencies (say goodbye to the Lamar Alexander and Mel Martinez types). But at the same time if they go for a full-on knuck-dragging "crazy", they run the risk of drawing stark distinctions that make it all the more clear why Romney and Giuliani are suspect in the first place (as well as inviting all kinds of negative stories in the national press). It will probably help them to have a nominee who appeals to true-blue conservatives, and a vice presidential nominee from the Sunbelt might seem particularly attractive.

All that said, just who is there to choose from? When all is said and done, there are probably two of their current (more or less) opponents who will merit consideration, Mike Huckabee and Fred Thompson. But who else would be the right kind of match for a Romney or Giuliani ticket? When it comes to other Southerners, I don't see any other people who fit quite right, except, possibly, for Gov. Bob Riley of Alabama, Rep. Eric Cantor of Virginia (for Giuliani, not Romney - I don't see any way a Mormon/Jew ticket would fly), and maybe (though not really) Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison of Texas (if there was a push to have a woman on the ticket, since they'll likely be facing a ticket headed by Senator Clinton.

Who else is there? It seems to me that there are three Sunbelt possibilities from Arizona. No, not John McCain. But his Senate colleague Jon Kyl is very well liked in traditional Republican circles, and he has the sort of staid, serious demeanor that could work well in vice presidential campaign. Arizona is also home to two of the members of Congress who have been most active in pushing the Republican party to the right (John Shadegg) and pushing it to fiscal responsibility and curbing spending (Jeff Flake). Flake couldn't run with Romney, both are Mormons, but I think he'd clearly excite the base, while also not terrifying the country at large. Is there anyone from outside the Sunbelt who might fit the bill? Only two names come to mind. Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty is well thought of in conservative circles, but he's so closely tied to the McCain campaign that I don't know if anyone else would consider him. My final idea? Rob Portman. The former Ohio congressman was immensely well liked by Republicans in the House (he could probably have been Speaker if he'd wanted to be), and he "took one for the team" and worked in the Bush administration (USTR and OMB). He's got loads of pluses on this matter, and he comes from vote-rich, purple Ohio.

Anyway, am I leaving anyone out? It's really hard to predict these things I know. It's a deeply personal choice on the part of the presidential nominee (who whoever he delegates with the task), and there are so few people who are picked that examining this issue is notoriously difficult because ofthe low N problem (small number of cases to analyze). But it does seem to me that given Giuliani and Romney's special challenges with their base, that they won't have as wide a set of possibilities to choose from as some other nominees might.

Posted by armand at August 19, 2007 02:04 PM | TrackBack | Posted to Politics


Comments

this isn't an area i have much to say about, but re Cantor -- so a Mormon / Jew ticket wouldn't fly, you say, but you think a Guiliani / Jew ticket would!? or rephrased, you think a [Suspiciously Liberal New York Accented Perceived-as-Moderate and Iffy on Liberal Issues] / Jew ticket would fly? i'd say Cantor's got no shot with either of those two, given electoral realities in critical areas.

but it is kind of a ticklish scenario to imagine: red state voters might stay home in droves if they had to choose between a Dem ticket featuring a woman and an african american and a GOP ticket featuring a New York pro-abortion hawk and a southern-fried jewish republican. granted, i know nothing about cantor, but then do i need to to suspect that he wouldn't be doing a Giuliani ticket any favors?

Posted by: moon at August 19, 2007 05:20 PM | PERMALINK

Well I was just trying to think of more Southern possibilities, and Cantor's was one of the few names that came to mind (since he's fairly prominent in DC as the Republicans' Chief Deputy Whip - and might well have won a higher ranking job than that last winter, if he'd sought a promotion). Maybe he wouldn't work for Giuliani either - but that again gets at these 2 needing to really build a lot of trust with the #2 pick, given the considerable distrust parts of the base will have for them. It'll be a tricky choice.

Posted by: Armand at August 19, 2007 07:46 PM | PERMALINK

Giuliani's chances of getting the nomination are inversely proportional to his leading opponents' willingness to sling mud, because as we all know, there's a Ninth-Ward-sized supply of very sticky mud to be slung at Giuliani. If he starts to look inevitable, that mud will get slung. Given that, does he have any chance at all?

Posted by: jacflash at August 20, 2007 09:31 AM | PERMALINK

I don't think he's likeliest nominee, no. But given the number of big primaries that'll happen in late January and early February with winner take-all-delegate allocation, and given his name recognition, I think it's definitely possible.

Posted by: Armand at August 20, 2007 10:07 AM | PERMALINK

I wouldn't rule out the W path, picking someone who's held a cabinet level post without a lot of baggage. Any two term senator's going to have too much voting record to pick apart and contradict with the presidential nominee. I see Huckabee as a possibility (I haven't ruled out his presidential prospects, to be frank), but his record is certainly not strictly conservative, so Giuliani Huckabee or Romney Huckabee would make most strong conservatives yawn and stay home on election night. Fred Thompson is in this way crucial to any successful Republican ticket, and though I hope for a Thompson Huckabee ticket, I wonder if Huckabee Thompson wouldn't play better than Giuliani Thompson, for both political and jacflash reasons.

Posted by: Morris at August 25, 2007 11:34 AM | PERMALINK

Guiliani Anybody and Romney Anybody would piss off a lot of "strong conservatives", so Huckabee's not worse on that score than anyone else.

As to your cabinet proposal, like I said there's Rob Portman who I think would be a savvy pick. Most of the cabinet though is either too toxic, too "empty suitish", or too "uh, what do they do again?" to nominate.

Posted by: Armand at August 25, 2007 11:49 AM | PERMALINK
Post a comment









Remember personal info?