January 19, 2009

Krugman on Wall Street Voodoo

This sounds silly and expensive.

Why go through these contortions? The answer seems to be that Washington remains deathly afraid of the N-word - nationalization. The truth is that Gothamgroup and its sister institutions are already wards of the state, utterly dependent on taxpayer support; but nobody wants to recognize that fact and implement the obvious solution: an explicit, though temporary, government takeover. Hence the popularity of the new voodoo, which claims, as I said, that elaborate financial rituals can reanimate dead banks.

Unfortunately, the price of this retreat into superstition may be high. I hope I'm wrong, but I suspect that taxpayers are about to get another raw deal - and that we're about to get another financial rescue plan that fails to do the job.

Posted by armand at January 19, 2009 12:48 PM | TrackBack | Posted to Economics


Comments

I can't improve on the way Atrios put it:

All along there's been a general unwillingness to acknowledge that the banks lost a lot of money. It isn't a problem of liquidity, or a problem of temporarily mispriced assets. The problem is that they lost a lot of fucking money.
Posted by: jacflash at January 19, 2009 02:58 PM | PERMALINK

Nor bombings on clinics providing medical services for women.

Posted by: binky at January 19, 2009 09:33 PM | PERMALINK

Geez Binky, I think I missed that provision of the bailout bill. You sure about that?

Posted by: jacflash at January 20, 2009 08:07 AM | PERMALINK
Post a comment









Remember personal info?