That's really all there is to these early attacks on the 2nd Ciruit judge. We get blind quotes about potential this and possible that, and extraordinarily vague comments that rebut each other ... but mostly it comes off like they are chatting at a 10th grade lunch table. These two might write on legal issues for publications respected in the halls of power - but I wouldn't call them journalists. They are right to note that her position on Ricci would be attacked at her confirmation hearing (should she have one), but that's not remotely surprising. And the less said about Taylor's claim that she masquerades as a moderate the better. He's in full-on Bob Novak mode there.
Posted by armand at May 4, 2009 08:40 AM | TrackBack | Posted to Law and the Courts