May 04, 2009

Fred Kaplan's Most Important Movies About War and Diplomacy

He thinks Stephen Walt and Dan Drezner have, at best, a weird take on the movies you really need to see to understand IR.

Posted by armand at May 4, 2009 10:47 PM | TrackBack | Posted to International Affairs | Movies | War


Comments

LOL at Godfather I and II being good examples of balance of power in action. And if Three Kings is going to be included in that list (at the end... don't think it's a part of Walt's list), why not Syriana?

Posted by: kikimonster at May 5, 2009 10:09 AM | PERMALINK

Maybe Kaplan thinks we should downplay the impact on IR of Big Law, MNCs, the oil economy, and foreign involvement in intra-state power struggles? B/c otherwise, yeah, why not Syriana?

Posted by: Armand at May 5, 2009 10:33 AM | PERMALINK

He pretty clearly thinks Syriana is lighter than I did; I think it's an excellent movie. I also think Children of Men is a nice choice, but I do think it's interesting for its quasi-pandemic milieu, with the quarantining, propaganda, etc. aspects. I really love that movie.

Posted by: moon at May 5, 2009 11:42 AM | PERMALINK

Or even better for the role of MNCs on government relations and NGO involvement in the developing world... The Constant Gardener. Loved that movie.

Posted by: kikimonster at May 5, 2009 01:09 PM | PERMALINK

Seems Syriana is popular among attorneys (and some poli sci profs). I love Children of Men, but I thought of it, politically, more in terms of authoritarianism and domestic politics than in terms of international politics or pandemics.

And I force students to write a paper on the IR-ness of one of about a half dozen films in my intro class. Constant Gardener is what a plurality of them wrote on. Very good movie.

Posted by: Armand at May 5, 2009 01:19 PM | PERMALINK

Interesting observation, re Syriana. I wonder if part of that phenomenon, to the extent it is one, has to do with the degree of backroom power it implies lawyers have. Which of course is true, in the sense that powerbrokers not infrequently have law degrees and active licenses, but that credential, I would venture (self-evidently) is neither necessary nor sufficient.

Posted by: moon at May 5, 2009 04:42 PM | PERMALINK

Kind of, maybe. I'd put it down more to the movie getting both the monotony and grunt work lawyers get stuck doing for long periods as well as the high drama they can also get involved in in situations like you mention.

Posted by: Armand at May 5, 2009 05:10 PM | PERMALINK
Post a comment









Remember personal info?