So no officer is disciplined for the extreme and rampant abuses in Iraq and Afghanistan, but if a general has sex he's gone. I wish I could say I was surprised, but ... ok, I'll feign being stunned and appalled at these bizarre priorities and "values". What is it with this administration, its supporters and sex?
Posted by armand at August 10, 2005 11:55 AM | TrackBack | Posted to PoliticsThis just can't possibly be about sex alone. Yes, heterosexual adultery violates the code, but they don't dump everyone who has extramarital sex. And they certainly don't go dumping high ranking generals. I don't know much about this sort of thing (baltar? help a buddy out here?) but Majikthise linked to this. I'm not saying it's right, but here's someone else thinking it might be politics.
Posted by: binky at August 11, 2005 11:15 AM | PERMALINK