February 02, 2006

Posted Without Comment

It's late and I'm tired.

The demonstrators arrived angry, departed furious. The police had herded them into pens. Stopped them from handing out fliers. Threatened them with arrest for standing on public sidewalks. Made notes on which politicians they cheered and which ones they razzed.

Meanwhile, officers from a special unit videotaped their faces, evoking for one demonstrator the unblinking eye of George Orwell's "1984."

"That's Big Brother watching you," the demonstrator, Walter Liddy, said in a deposition.

Mr. Liddy's complaint about police tactics, while hardly novel from a big-city protester, stands out because of his job: He is a New York City police officer. The rallies he attended were organized in the summer of 2004 by his union, the Patrolmen's Benevolent Association, to protest the pace of contract talks with the city.

Now the officers, through their union, are suing the city, charging that the police procedures at their demonstrations many of them routinely used at war protests, antipoverty marches and mass bike rides were so heavy-handed and intimidating that their First Amendment rights were violated.

A lawyer for the city said the police union members were treated no differently than hundreds of thousands of people at other gatherings, with public safety and free speech both protected. The department observes all constitutional requirements, the city maintains.

So, that's supposed to make the rest of us feel better?

Posted by binky at February 2, 2006 10:59 PM | TrackBack | Posted to The Ever Shrinking Constitution


I saw that and thought'holyschmoly.' It's a sad state of affairs. No one should accept it as 'normal.'

Posted by: kcb at February 3, 2006 08:24 AM | PERMALINK
Post a comment

Remember personal info?