Look, this should come as no surprise, but I think this list proves that Forbes shouldn't put itself in the business of listing the hottest anything. This bit of link trolling only considers unmarried royals under 35, but still ... c'mon. Prince William as #1? I don't think so. I think most people consider his brother to be hotter than him, and neither one of them should be in the top 2, much less 1 and 2. Both are above Carl Philip of Sweden? Uh, no. For my vote the Casiraghis are the hottest European royals these days, and yet they are well down the list. And Freddy Windsor doesn't even make the top 20? That's weird.
Posted by armand at June 2, 2008 02:19 PM | TrackBack | Posted to Pure Unadulterated SnarkYeah, they are obviously (well, hopefully this is the right explanation) not ranking them purely on attractiveness but saying "hot" as in "the most now," kind of like such and such book or movie is "the hottest one of the moment." Because yeah, Harry is definitely the cute one and some of those female royals - not winning any beauty contests.
Posted by: ryan at June 2, 2008 04:58 PM | PERMALINKUm... Hello, Carl Philip. Who knew they could raise dark and brooding in Sweden?
Posted by: kikimonster at June 3, 2008 08:39 AM | PERMALINK